After Years Filled With Jazz, Struggling in Retirement

It was an unusual sight to see at a union rally, especially one in New York City: a processional of musicians, some wearing Mardi Gras beads, parading down West 4th Street on Tuesday afternoon, riffing on impromptu tunes and better-known anthems like “When the Saints Go Marching In.”

Despite the festive mood, however, the reason for the gathering of jazz musicians and officials of the union that represents them, Local 802, was the fact that many of the union’s jazz artists are struggling to support themselves in retirement. By organizing the event and the “Justice for JazzArtists!” movement, which has also been getting its message out with this video, the union is hoping to organize musicians and the venues where they play to assist them later in life.

“It’s about respect,” said Paul Molloy, a union spokesperson. “Regrettably, at the end of their lives they have very little to show for it.”

The story of the union and its efforts to maintain a robust retirement fund is long and complex, especially in recent years. It was organized in 1921 to provide benefits and collective bargaining power to musicians. It represents about 8,700 members in and around New York City, including Broadway musicians, orchestral musicians, recording artists, teaching artists, instrumentalists and a number of singers. Roughly one third are jazz musicians.

In the 1960s, legislation diverted tax revenues from admissions to Broadway, opera, ballet and concert performances to health benefits and the American Federation of Musicians pension fund, the latter of which now amounts to a $2 billion fund from which participating musicians can draw in retirement.

In 2006, Local 802 sought to include smaller venues, like jazz clubs, in the pension fund. It lobbied the state legislature to forgive the 8.375 percent sales tax for ticket sales at the door, with the hope that club owners would still collect the tax dollar amount and contribute it to the American Federation of Musicians pension fund. Gov. George E. Pataki signed the measure into law in 2007, but, according to Mr. Molloy, no one stepped up to organize contributions. While it’s hard to calculate how much money has been lost, the union estimates that a busy club charging 150 people a night a $30 cover charge can collect roughly $40,000 to 50,000 a week.

Some venues, like the New School for Jazz and Contemporary Music and Lincoln Center Jazz, participate in the pension plan, but many others operate with informal accounting and use cash-only transactions that make it easier to avoid passing on the savings. The overall goal of the protest was to get employers, including the clubs, to avoid this temptation and contribute.

More than 100 musicians and supporters turned out on Tuesday. One sat in the back row wearing a black Broadway Unions United T-shirt, a tuba in his lap. The rally began at the Judson Memorial Church in Greenwich Village and was led by Bob Cranshaw, the 76-year-old bass guitarist who has collaborated with the likes of Ella Fitzgerald, Thelonious Monk and Wayne Shorter.

The trumpeter Jimmy Owens recalled 1987, when Congress declared jazz a national treasure. He asked what’s become of that protection.

Councilman Alan J. Gerson stood up in front of the crowd and avowed his commitment to use the power of legislation, if necessary, to force the club owners to support their former employees. “Our government has a responsibility to ensure a place for art,” he said. “We want to encourage them,” he said about club owners. “But if they don’t do it voluntarily, then we need to make it mandatory.”

After several speeches accompanied by several soulful “mmmhmm”s and loud, exuberant applause, the attending musicians, many of whom had brought the tools of their trade, stood up and proceeded out down the stairs and onto the steps of a church facing Washington Square Park. They picked up ready-made signs scrawled with pithy summaries of Local 802’s demands and their instruments and paraded loudly to the Blue Note, one of the city’s most famous jazz clubs.

Many passers-by stopped and stared. One woman inside a building rushed to the window with an expression of surprise, then laughter.

When the procession reached the front of the club, Bill Dennison, a vice president of the musicians union, brought forward a petition as thick as a cereal box signed by more than 2,000 professional musicians that forcefully asked management to change its ways. The doors to the Blue Note did not open all the way. There was no dialogue. Mr. Dennison handed the stack of papers to a worker at the door, politely waved and thanked the representative and rejoined the crew outside.

The Blue Note had no comment.

At the rally, Craig Haynes, the son of the drummer Roy Haynes and a drummer himself who recently picked up the alto saxophone after a hiatus, said he does “a little bit of everything” to cobble together an income that supports his life in Queens. In addition to teaching and playing in schools, hospitals and churches, he also dresses up as an action hero and plays the saxophone outside Yankee Stadium. (He declined to identify which action hero as he wants to protect his anonymity). On a good night, he said, he can pull in $150.

“I have friends who make one million dollars a year,” he said. But most musicians, he said, work two to three times a week at $75 per night. “You might only make $5,000 a year.”

Also at the rally was Dick Griffin, a trombonist who said he felt lucky to have the cushion of Social Security from the federal government and a New York City pension, something he earned teaching music in public schools for 14 years. At 69 years old, he draws $172 a month from the musicians’ pension fund, the same amount that he’s been getting since he turned 55.

“I would be in bad shape,” he said, if he didn’t have access to the additional monthly support. “I couldn’t even buy subway fare.”

Comments are no longer being accepted.

Captain Democracy North Beach, San Francisco Ca. September 30, 2009 · 3:34 pm

I would like to see a, “Special tax of three cents” be put on all sales of discs and records of all music to support these musicians in retirement. Handwriting has gone out for the computer age, whats next? “Musicians go out for the Robot age?”
//www.CaptainDemocracy.wordpress.com

I love jazz, and I play jazz, but complaining that “most
musicians work two to three times a week at $75 per night” is hardly an argument for getting a pension.

There are plenty of jazz musicians who refuse to work for $75 a pop.

They play only the jobs that pay. They use the income to record and promote their own jazz CDs; rent local *concert* (not club) venues where they perform to audiences that listen; and they accept event and wedding jobs that pay well.

There is nothing noble in selling yourself or the music short. It hurts you professionally, personally, and ensures that your music will only be heard by a small number of people.

Clamoring for a pension only draws attention to the fact that jazz musicians routinely agree to work for pennies. That hurts jazz, and it hurts all professional musicians.

Leah R. Garnett
//www.musicafter50.com

No problem here! The legislature should simply reinstate the ticket tax and earmark it for the musician’s union. Afterward the legislator’s could do a little night clubbing as they should be feeling pretty good about themselves! The musicians, whose very life force fuels the night club scene, should not have to rely on the “kindness of strangers”. It isn’t going to happen.

Most every person agrees that nothing replaces live music, yet getting people to pay for it or support the players is foreign to most. And why not? I just played at Harvard University for no pay, Boston’s Symphony Hall for $25, Ritz for $30 – a joke. Three places that talk Union but often go around. Three places I won’t play at again unless pay and respect come with. I can’t afford those jobs anymore!
-Aaron, Boston

Jazz recordings play in the background at a lot of our fancy restaurants. Many of the folks on these recordings are retired. They can’t eat in the places where their performances help supply atmosphere. A lot of them can’t afford to eat in the neighborhood diners. Kinda crummy, say I. There should be a way of providing quality of life for people who improve the quality of lives of others.

Wish the city were more pro-active in supporting the artists who make New York the cultural center that is at the heart of its appeal. Very rough to support yourself in a town where the expenses are so high and the compensations for performers so low.

Somebody always seems to be game to build another expensive building to house the arts, but how about the artists who work in them? is it that you can screw a placque into a building and not a person? How about if artists wore necklaces that read, “This esteemed artist supported by a generous grant from the Goniff Corporation”?

Maybe they could raise some funds teaching AFFORDABLE classes to jazz enthusiasts who didn’t have a chance to go to a degree program for music study but still learn on their own. You try to take lessons from classical teachers they want to shaft you with $100 a lesson B.S., get together groups of 5-10 students and just have a master class type setting and everyone pitch in 25 bucks or something. Trust me I WISH the million dollar hipsters would take some music lessons because their indierock is crude at best but chances are people who really want jazz level lessons are not going to be loaded with cash. Keep it cheap and just have a schedule at a building somewhere and you like the topic of the class you pay your $25 bucks and you hang out for the night or whatever.

As a subscriber to Jazz@LC – I am glad to see that they “play by the rules” and contribute their fair share to the musicians’ pension fund. Artistic Director Wynton Marsalis also makes it a point to give a lot of old timers some performance time during the concert year as either featured artists or guest band members. This performance time manages to put a few extra bucks in the pockets for these retired greats too.

Shame on the Blue Note and other profitable clubs who pocket the monies they were expected to contribute to the fund after the sales tax was lifted.

If we had a functioning state government I’d suggest re-instating the tax and channeling the money directly to the pension fund. That is, if we had a functioning state government…..

I feel for them, but this is a country and government that refuses to provide health care for its citizens. Politicians in power are happy to let 50 million people suffer and die or go bankrupt. Why would it care about art?

I don’t have a problem with asking for some help from the clubs that have benefited all these years from their talent but that doesn’t go far enough. If we can adopt a highway or our favorite zoo animals, why can’t we adopt our favorite jazz musicians? I’d gladly contribute regularly to these incredible people that are clearly overlooked and deserving of our support. They are national treasures and I’d happily donate but don’t have a clue how to organize something like this. NYTimes? Any ideas?

If it wasn’t for the dedication of these great artists, the club owners would have nothing to offer. The only reason people come out, is to experience this wonderful music, not just to sit in their clubs and purchase overpriced drinks. The owners should be ashamed of themselves. I find it hard to believe (although I know it’s true) for a good musician of any genre of music to perform for $75. How can anyone survive in NYC receiving this paltry wage. The other problem , I hate to say, is the musicians themselves. The old expression “I’ve seen the enemy, and the enemy is us” is true in many ways. If all musicians said “no” to unfair/unsustainable pay, it might a message the employers would finally get (through lack of customers).

Ms.Garnett and Mr. Logan are spot on. The problem is basic economics. If musician will play for low wages, then clubs will hire them for low wages. Playing for $75 a night doesn’t do anyone any good except the club owners.

Believe me, I know how hard it is to make a living doing this. I have two kids and a wife (plus one kid on the way) to support and I live in Lansing, MI which doesn’t even have a jazz club. And yet I’m doing my best to make ends meet performing in an organ-based trio (organissimo).

Its pretty much understood that in order to practice our art, we have to supplement our income. organissimo is picky and doesn’t play for less than a standard amount (no $50 gigs for us!) but I still have to do something else to earn money. I learned to tune and repair pianos. Other musicians I know teach. Others have day gigs. That’s just the way it is.

Musicians need to take responsibility for their own choices. This includes the misguided idea that society owes us something just because we play jazz. If you want respect for the music you need to respect yourself and not settle for $50 gigs. If all musicians said “No!” to these bad wages, the clubs wouldn’t have any choice but to pay up.

Also, as Ms. Garnett said, musicians should not rely solely on clubs to provide gigs. Get out there and book you own shows at rental halls and the like. With the right marketing and fan base, those types of gigs can be much more profitable for the musicians than a club gig anyway. Produce and sell your own CDs. The tools at our disposal now in the Internet age allow us to do it all ourselves.

Most musicians are horrible business people. If the union does anything, it should offer free business classes to its members so they can learn the basics of running a business. Because the bottom line is that playing music is a business; unless you’re lucky enough to have a “patron of the arts” supporting you or a trust fund. Or an honest manager. But I don’t know anybody in that situation! ;)

—-Jim Alfredson
//www.organissimo.org

The belief that the AFM union will save the ‘ordinary’ musician is a flat out myth that is favorable only to the union.

A musician will receive pension monies from the union only for years during which he collected $1500 or more in pay through union checks. It’s called being ‘vested’ in the union pension fund. For those that fall short of the mark, too bad. The union just hangs on to the money – along with your union dues – for it’s own benefit.

The union benefits only musicians in steady orchestra, theater or studio gigs and not the ordinary player.

(For those considering going to music school, for pete’s sake get a music ed degree and use it. Yes, a performance degree requires you to explore outside your box but provides for an instant job with benefits as soon as you graduate. For those of you who believe you’re too virtuosic, you’ll still get all the training you’ll need to perform at the top of your game. If not, consider master’s degree training.)

WRT the idea that if all musicians refuse to play clubs for $75, the owners will acquiesce and raise their pay: dream on! The key word is “all.” Ain’t gonna happen, folks.

(BTW, guess how much these club gigs paid TWENTY years ago? That’s right, $75!)

Also, I’m seeing a new trend: some very well-known, 1st-call NYC studio musicians can be seen playing club gigs for almost nothing. Sometimes they even lose money. My guess is they don’t care about the pay because they were lucky to be doing jingles back when that work was plentiful, and now they’re collecting their pensions. They can afford to play for their own pleasure.

Can’t really blame them. Nobody gets into playing jazz because they want to make money, they NEED TO PLAY. Then they grow up and discover that they have to somehow make a living!

Maybe we should take a look at the jazz education industry that churns out hundreds and hundreds of players each year for an art form that is barely financially viable even in the best of times. When these kids (and their parents) pays tens of thousands of dollars in tuition for a music degree, then the equation is skewed from the start. How can any one compete with the jazz conservatory students who are willing to play for tips? I would hate to be facing retirement while competing for gigs with some European scholarship recipient from the New School.

…not to diss the New School in particular though, since the article does say they contirbute to the pension fund. It’s the concept of the expensive private conservatories turning out jazz studies majors that bugs me.

Aren’t jazz singers a) never to retire, and b) supposed to be in a constant state of struggle?

khristina.narizhnaya October 2, 2009 · 5:16 pm

There are some things that musicians can do when they reach retirement age, I blogged about one musician who keeps going despite the lack of money and the chaos that life throws at her:

//blogs.journalism.cuny.edu/interactive2010/2009/10/02/free-jazz-and-a-little-bit-of-soul/

Keith Charles Edwards October 6, 2009 · 5:08 pm

This is a disgrace and these new kids come to NY from these backward right-to-work states and work for nothing. This is why our economy is what it is. When organized labor dominates, ALL prosper. I agree with the comment that all the musicians refuse these chaep gigs. The union is the only union that fought against the entertainment tax. If all unions would fight against unecessary taxes…